Understanding the origin of corrosion in a galvanized steel pipe
Corrosion on a galvanized steel pipe appears when the zinc layer, intended to act as a sacrificial anode, no longer provides lasting protection for the steel. In a hydraulic system, several factors can destabilize this protection: unsuitable water quality, the presence of dissolved oxygen, chlorides, unfavorable pH, stagnation, deposits, galvanic couples between different materials, or a local coating defect. The zinc may then dissolve abnormally, form white rust, and leave the bare steel to oxidize. In some cases, a zinc polarity reversal can abruptly accelerate attack on the substrate.
The phenomenon does not remain local: it generates corrosion products and sludge that foul heat exchangers, clog flow sections, and degrade circulators. Ignoring corrosion means condemning all the building’s hydraulic equipment.
Role of zinc, passivation, and loss of protection
The galvanized coating protects the steel through both barrier effect and sacrificial protection. In service, the zinc normally forms a passivation layer that limits its dissolution.
If this layer is unstable, porous, or destroyed by the water chemistry, the zinc is consumed more quickly. The presence of oxygen, dissolved salts, temperature variations, or stagnant zones can promote this degradation.
The first signs are often whitish deposits, known as white rust, followed by deeper attack.
Visible signs on the network and hydraulic consequences
A galvanized steel failure analysis often begins with operating symptoms: cloudy water, grayish or whitish sludge, repeated filter clogging, reduced flow, abnormal pressure losses, noise in pumps, localized corrosion on fittings, or the appearance of leaks.
White powdery deposits may indicate zinc attack, while red-brown oxides signal damage to the underlying steel.
Corrosion and metallurgy investigation approach
The investigation relies on a multi-scale approach: visual examination of the affected areas, metallographic observation, characterization of deposits, and comparison between sound and failed areas. The objective is to identify the corrosion mode, assess the degree of oxidation, verify the condition of the galvanized coating, and identify possible precursors such as halogens, contaminants, or incrusted deposits.
This methodology makes it possible to link the observed damage to the actual service conditions.
Investigating the failure to stop network degradation
The issue is not only to note the presence of rust or deposits, but to identify the root cause of the failure. A relevant investigation combines observation of the affected areas, analysis of deposits, assessment of the condition of the zinc and steel, and study of the service environment.
This approach makes it possible to distinguish galvanic corrosion in a network, under-deposit corrosion, attack by overly aggressive water, a passivation defect, or an electrochemical imbalance linked to operation. The goal is to provide a construction corrosion diagnosis that can be used to decide on corrective actions: water treatment, material changes, elimination of a galvanic couple, network cleaning, or targeted replacement of degraded sections.
Galvanic coupling and polarity reversal
In a network containing several metals, the difference in electrode potential can create a galvanic cell. The least noble metal becomes anodic and corrodes preferentially. If local conditions change, the behavior of the zinc can shift and lead to a zinc polarity reversal, a particularly critical situation for the durability of the coating. This scenario is common when water composition, deposits, or contact surfaces alter electrochemical balances.
When corrosion becomes a risk for the installation
When corrosion products circulate through the system, they accumulate in low points, heat exchangers, valves, and pumps. This solid contamination disrupts hydraulic balancing and can cause premature wear of components. The later the intervention, the greater the risk of widespread degradation. In heating and chilled water systems, the indirect cost linked to shutdowns, replacements, and cleaning can quickly exceed the cost of the investigation.
Technical methods that can be used depending on the case
Selon la problématique, différents moyens techniques peuvent être mis en œuvre : essais électrochimiques avec mesure du potentiel libre (OCV), étude de la vitesse de corrosion (LSV), mesure d’impédance électrochimique (EIS) et essai de couplage galvanique ; analyses de surface et de dépôts par MEB-EDX, XPS, DRX et microscopie optique ; analyses chimiques par ICP ; simulations de milieux spécifiques, vieillissement accéléré et essais comparatifs de matériaux ou traitements de surface. Cette combinaison permet d’établir un diagnostic robuste et de hiérarchiser les causes probables.
Moving from assessment to corrective action
FILAB supports operators, property managers, fluid engineering firms, and installers in the FILAB metallurgical expertise of network failures.
The value of a laboratory approach for a pipe analysis is to turn a visible issue into an evidence-based diagnosis, then into an action plan. By combining electrochemical testing, surface analysis, chemical characterization, and environmental simulations, it becomes possible to identify the dominant cause, validate technical hypotheses, and guide lasting corrective measures.