Case study

Industrial marking on metal parts: cleaning process

This is a laser surface treatment of the texturing type that can be used to create effects or give new properties to all types of materials depending on the desired function.
Home • News • Industrial marking on metal parts: cleaning process

The problem?

What is the approach for conducting a cleaning process study in the context of industrial marking?

Industrial marking is an essential practice in many sectors, including aerospace, medical devices, automotive, and more. It is a method used to inscribe information on products or components, such as serial numbers, barcodes, manufacturing dates, logos, or any other specific instructions. These markings are crucial for traceability, quality management, regulatory compliance, and product safety.

Summary

01
Background to the cleaning process study
02
Measurement of nickel content and comparative study
03
Additional analysis by ICP-AES
04
Additional analysis using FTIR
05
Conclusion of the study
01

Background to the cleaning process study

First, FILAB's client performs surface treatment on nickel joints. This involves laser texturing, a surface treatment that creates effects or gives new properties to all types of materials depending on the desired function.

This laser marking leaves behind a small amount of dust.

The study will focus on measuring the amount of nickel dust deposited on the parts after marking and comparing three post-marking cleaning processes.

Three samples are analyzed for the comparative study:

  • untreated (without cleaning),
  • cleaning with solvent and ultrasound,
  • cleaning with a brush and blowing.
02

Measurement of nickel content and comparative study

SEM-EDX Analysis (Scanning Electron Microscope)

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDX) technology is a well-known and recognized technique. It produces very high-resolution images of a sample's surface (magnification of around *1,000,000). It is used to study the chemical composition and morphology of solid materials.

In this specific context, SEM-EDX analysis of nickel (Ni) joints reveals:

  • The presence of particles around each hole on all textured parts.
  • The surfaces of the holes, on the other hand, do not show any particles, only cavities resulting from laser marking.
  • The quantity of particles appears to be lower on cleaned parts (brushing + blowing) than on raw parts.
  • However, it is difficult to determine whether the quantity of particles is lower on parts degreased by ultrasound.
03

Additional analysis by ICP-AES

ICP-AES is a cutting-edge technique that uses inductively coupled plasma to excite atoms and ions in a sample, producing light emissions specific to each element. Thanks to its sensitivity and ability to analyze multiple elements simultaneously, ICP-AES is an essential tool for accurate and rapid characterization of materials.

ICP-AES analysis highlights that:

  • The nickel content obtained is lower for brushed and degreased products than for those analyzed without cleaning.
  • The treatments therefore do have the effect of reducing the nickel content and thus the quantity of particles present on the parts.
  • Cleaning by brushing and blowing appears to be slightly more effective than degreasing with ultrasound.

04

Additional analysis using FTIR

Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) is an analytical technique used to obtain the absorption spectrum of a solid, liquid, or gaseous sample. FTIR chemical analysis are non-destructive and measure the amount of light absorbed by a sample. This is done based on the wavelengths emitted by an infrared beam.

In this study, FTIR was used to detect the presence of polylactate and cellulose particles (related to the brushing of the parts).

05

Conclusion of the study

The analysis carried out by FILAB shed light on the interaction between unwanted particles and the surfaces of treated parts, highlighting the crucial importance of carefully selecting the appropriate cleaning processes.

For FILAB's client, it is essential to adopt a methodical approach when choosing these methods, taking into account not only their effectiveness in removing contaminants but also their ability to preserve the structural and functional integrity of the parts.

Thus, after analysis and expert assessments have been carried out, the client is in a position to make the best decision according to their needs.

Need help? Contact our team

Other case studies you may be interested in

Polyamide PA

Polyamide polymers, more widely known as nylons, are widely used by many industries. PA 6 and PA 6.6 polyamide polymers are the most commonly used. Learn more +

ATG kinetics: simulation of PVC part aging

One of our customers wants to evaluate the thermal behavior of 3D-printed parts. Learn more +

Galvanic coupling: securing a naval assembly

One of our customers encountered sealing issues during the final validation tests of their product. Learn more +

Services related to the case study

Laboratory analysis of a joint

Medical Devices

Laboratory analysis and expertise of surface treatments

Aeronautics

Automobile

Laboratory specializing in analysis and expertise for industrial companies

+140 employees
+140 employees here to listen to you
5,200 m² laboratory
5,200 m² laboratory +99% of services carried out in-house
Accredited laboratory
Accredited laboratory COFRAC ISO 17025
+2,200 clients
+2,200 clients in France and abroad

Contact us

Our services are reserved for professionals.

Frequently asked questions

How can cleaning processes be compared after laser marking on nickel?

The comparison involves characterizing residual particles on unprocessed parts and on parts cleaned using each process. In this study, FILAB compared solvent and ultrasonic cleaning with brushing followed by air blowing. SEM-EDX, ICP-AES, and FTIR provided complementary results on the residues.

What does SEM-EDX reveal about laser-marked metal parts?

SEM-EDX makes it possible to locate particles, observe their morphology, and characterize their elemental composition. In the nickel joints examined in this study, particles were present around the holes after laser texturing. The observations suggested a reduction after brushing and blowing, but on their own they did not clearly distinguish between all the processes.

Why supplement particle observation with ICP-AES quantification?

ICP-AES provides a quantitative measurement of the nickel present in the samples prepared for analysis. It complements surface images, whose interpretation may remain qualitative. In this study, the results showed a lower content after both cleaning procedures than in the as-received state, with a slight advantage for brushing followed by blowing.

Can effective cleaning of metallic particles leave other residues behind?

A cleaning process can reduce metallic particles while introducing or leaving behind other substances. In this study, FTIR revealed polylactate and cellulose particles associated with brushing. The assessment must therefore cover all relevant residues, depending on the part’s cleanliness requirements.

Which cleaning process should be chosen after laser texturing?

The choice depends on the required level of cleanliness, the residues observed, and the treatment’s compatibility with the part. Under the conditions of this study, brushing followed by air blowing slightly reduced the measured nickel levels more effectively, but organic residues were also detected. The results help identify a suitable compromise for the industrial requirement, which must then be validated.